Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Vincent Alexis v. Ian Connors, et al
as 23-2502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT P. ALEXIS
Defendant / Appellee:
IAN CONNORS, Administrator BOP/DOJ, J.L. NORWOOD, Regional Director BOP/DOJ, J. WILK, Health Service Administrator FCI Fort Dix and others
LEINHEISER v. SHAKIR et al
as 1:2022cv05848
Plaintiff:
NOE D LEINHEISER
Defendant:
DR. AHMAR SHAKIR and DR. RAVI SOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
AIKEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv05140
Plaintiff:
LARRY WAYNE AIKEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and RAVI SOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02155
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BARNES v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2021cv02523
Defendant:
LT. DECKER, DAVID E. ORTIZ, DR. IBE and others
Plaintiff:
LORENZO BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01111
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NURSE #1, J. WILKS, CHOGOZIE IBE, PA and others
Plaintiff:
GARRETT DAVARRAS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOSES v. SOOD et al
as 1:2020cv01025
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MOSES
Defendant:
RAVI SOOD, CLINICAL DIRECTOR NICOLETTA TURNER-FOSTER, JEFFREY WILK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUEVAS v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv00832
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, RAVI SOOD, M.D., J. HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN CUEVAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. IBE et al
as 1:2018cv12543
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3, CHIGOZIE IBE, IDC, BURLEW, R&D and others
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALEXIS v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv02099
Plaintiff:
VINCENT P. ALEXIS
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, MARK S. INCH, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
