Cases 1 - 10 of 23
GOODEN v. ROYCE et al
as 1:2024cv05440
Petitioner:
MAURICE GOODEN
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FITCH v. KUHN et al
as 3:2022cv05884
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN D. FITCH
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, RAYMOND ROYCE, MAJOR CRAIG SEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORMASI v. HICKS et al
as 3:2022cv01745
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. TORMASI
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, JOHN FALVEY, JOHNATHAN GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. ROYCE et al
as 3:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
RAK RALPH BAKER
Defendant:
RAYMOND ROYCE, MARSHAL FLETCHER, MICHAEL CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITEHURST v. ROYCE et al
as 2:2021cv20741
Petitioner:
TIQUAN WHITEHURST
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MELLS v. ROYCE
as 2:2021cv20363
Petitioner:
ANDRE MELLS
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. ROYCE et al
as 1:2021cv20335
Petitioner:
MARCUS ST. CLAIRE WHITE
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2021cv20165
Petitioner:
ROBBY R. WILLIS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RAYMOND ROYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOUGLAS v. ROYCE et al
as 3:2021cv17884
Petitioner:
LAMONT O. DOUGLAS
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adrian GuilleIn re: Adrian Guille
as 21-2842
Petitioner:
In re: ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Respondent:
DAVID RICHARDS, AMY EMRICH, S. PATTERSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
