Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Nathaniel Gann v. Valley State Prison, et al
as 22-16862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY STATE PRISON, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATEWIDE RELIGIOUS REVIEW COMMITTEE, J. KNIGHT, Appeals Examiner at the Office of Appeals (CDCR) and others
(PC) Robbins v. Fisher, et al.
as 1:2021cv01642
Plaintiff:
Earl James Robbins, Sr.
Defendant:
Raythel Fisher, Jr., A. Medellin, Howard E. Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Grzeslo v. Fisher et al
as 1:2021cv01371
Plaintiff:
James Grzeslo
Defendant:
Raythel Fisher, Jr., B. Davi, E. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Page v. Fisher
as 1:2021cv00749
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher, Jr.
Petitioner:
Jason Alan Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Zelaya v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00033
Plaintiff:
Oscar Zelaya
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Phillips v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ebel v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Vladimir R. Ebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Fox v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Michael Joseph Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thomas v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hiram Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Marroquin v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00032
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rodolfo Marroquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
