Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Zemprelli v. Royal Bank of Scotland Group P
as 12-3642
Plaintiff:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, Edward P. Zemprelli, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Freeman Group
Defendant:
Thomas Fulton Wilson McKillop, Sir, Colin Alexander Mason Buchan, UBS Securities L.L.C. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Frederick Anderson Goodwin, Sir and others
The Mills Corporation Securiti
as 10-1150
:
In re: THE MILLS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Appellant:
DANIEL ROCKER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff:
IRWIN BERLIN, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, VERNON E. RUDOLPH, FREDERIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - None:
KENNETH R. PARENT, NICHOLAS MCDONOUGH, JOHN M. INGRAM and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
JOHN J. MCAVOY
Appellee:
JEFFREY WARREN GOLAN, JEFFREY ALAN BARRACK, CHAD A. CARDER and others
Movant - None:
KANAM SERVICES L.P., KANAM MANAGEMENT LLC, KANAM PROVIDERS INCORPORATED and others
The Mills Corporation Securiti v. Kenneth Parent
as 10-1125
:
In re: THE MILLS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IRWIN BERLIN, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, VERNON E. RUDOLPH, FREDERIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD STANLEY, JOAN KLOC and MARVIN MINE
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH R. PARENT
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS MCDONOUGH, JOHN M. INGRAM, JOSEPH B. GILDENHORN and others
Defendant - None:
COLOMBE M. NICHOLAS, CHARLES R. BLACK, S. JOSEPH BRUNO and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
JOHN J. MCAVOY
Movant - None:
KANAM SERVICES L.P., KANAM MANAGEMENT LLC, KANAM PROVIDERS INCORPORATED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
