Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Moffitt et al v. RCI Dining Services (Harvey), Inc. d/b/a Scarlett's Cabaret St. Louis
as 3:2023cv01059
Plaintiff:
Ursula Moffitt and Kristen White
Defendant:
RCI Dining Services (Harvey), Inc. d/b/a Scarlett's Cabaret St. Louis and RCI Dining Services (Harvey), Inc. doing business as Scarlett's Carbaret St Louis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Campbell v. RCI Holdings Inc.
as 1:2022cv01242
Plaintiff:
Brandi Campbell
Defendant:
RCI Holdings Inc. doing business as Kappa Kabanna Men's Club, Woodford Investments Inc. doing business as, Kappa Kabanna and RCI Dining Services Inc doing business as Kappa Kabanna Men's Club
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
COLLIER et al v. RCI DINING SERVICES (INDIANA) INC. d/b/a THE PONY et al
as 1:2022cv00747
Plaintiff:
ALEXUS COLLIER, SHABRE WILLIAMS, NYKKEAH MANSFIELD and others
Defendant:
RCI DINING SERVICES (INDIANA) INC., CHARLES GERALD WESTLUND, JR., MATT JESSE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
COHEN v. RCI VACATION EXCHANGE, CO.
as 1:2017cv02577
Plaintiff:
CARY COHEN
Defendant:
RCI VACATION EXCHANGE, CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Chicago Tile Institute Welfare Plan et al v. RCI Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00896
Plaintiff:
Chicago Tile Institute Welfare Plan , Chicago Tile Institute Pension Plan , Ceramic Tile and Terrazzo Local 21 B.A.C. Annuity Plan and others
Defendant:
RCI Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chicago Tile Institute Welfare Plan et al v. RCI Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00633
Plaintiff:
Chicago Tile Institute Welfare Plan, Chicago Tile Institute Welfare Plan, Chicago Tile Institute Pension Plan and others
Defendant:
RCI Enterprises, Inc. and Jason Lawson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
