Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Bonilla v. Clay et al
as 4:2020cv08226
Defendant:
Jeffrey W. Horner, Thomas Reardon and Clarence Don Clay
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Clay et al
as 4:2020cv07561
Defendant:
Tara Desautels, Nora Becerra, Catherine Kobal and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04728
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03398
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Reardon
as 4:2020cv03353
Defendant:
Thomas Reardon
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leo Cono v. William Barr et al
as 2:2020cv02656
Plaintiff:
Leo Cono and Cono
Defendant:
Kathy Moralez, Madelyne Bloom, John Desheplo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jeffrey I. Barke et al v. Eric Banks et al
as 8:2020cv00358
Plaintiff:
Ed Sachs, Phillip Yarbrough, Rodger Dohm and others
Defendant:
J. Felix De La Torre, Eric Banks, Arthur A. Krantz and others
Intervenor Defendant:
California Federation of Teachers, SEIU California State Council, California Labor Federation and others
Petitioner:
Xavier Becerra
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
JoBeth Halper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Judge Reardon et al
as 3:2019cv08384
Respondent:
Judge Reardon and Morris Jacobson
Petitioner:
Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reardon v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv06050
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reardon
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Magee v. Arkowitz et al
as 2:2019cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee and Ruchell Cinque Magee- PREFILING ORDER
Defendant:
Steven Arkowitz, Timothy A. Reardon and J. Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
