Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Redd v. AHS Medical Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Redd
Defendant:
AHS Medical Holdings LLC doing business as Ardent Health Services and Ardent Medical Services, Inc. doing business as Ardent Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burke v. AHS Medical Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Billie Burke
Defendant:
AHS Medical Holdings LLC doing business as Ardent Health Services, Ardent Medical Services, Inc. doing business as Ardent Health Services and AHS Management Company, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Redd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America et al v. 0.005 Acre of Land, More or Less, & Cemetery, Bural & Access Rights with Respect to Six Tracks of Land et al
as 3:2021cv00249
Defendant:
Lena Ruth Redd Davis, Unknown Heirs of Martha Polite, Jaqueline D. Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Redd v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02829
Plaintiff:
Rubye L. Redd
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2012cv00940
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, (f/n/u) Logan, Laura Kastan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Foster et al
as 3:2012cv00938
Plaintiff:
Dennis Paul Neal
Defendant:
Melissa Foster, Correct Care Solutions, Laura Kastan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
