Cases 1 - 10 of 537
Reginald Gary v. Gregory Nicolaysen et al
as 2:2024cv02489
Plaintiff:
Reginald A Gary
Defendant:
Gregory Nicolaysen, Kathleen Longwell, Roger Karlsson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kiley Revel v. Curtis Farmer et al
as 2:2024cv01438
Plaintiff:
Kiley Revel
Defendant:
Curtis Farmer, James Herzog, Nancy Avila and others
Groves v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Reginald Groves
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jacobsen v. Bickerstaff et al
as 3:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Christian Jacobsen
Defendant:
George Bickerstaff, Fred Cohen, Grace E. Colon and others
Walter Reginald Beasley, Jr. v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Walter Reginald Beasley, Jr.
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
(SS) Morgan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Reginald Desean Morgan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Osvaldik et al
as 1:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Reginald Smith
Defendant:
Peter Osvaldik and T-Mobile Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Reginald Wright v. Delray Richardson
as 8:2023cv02097
Plaintiff:
Reginald Wright an individual doing business as Bomb First
Defendant:
Delray Richardson an individual doing business as Straight Game TV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
