Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Chattin v. Ideal Business Partners, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Cacey C. Decker, Does 1-30, Nevada Credico Inc., a Nevada corporation doing business as Quantum Collections and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Chattin and Daniel W Chattin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ball v. Schmidt
as 6:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Reginald K. Ball
Defendant:
Desiree Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brain v. Michaels et al
as 6:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Reginald Michaels, Pacific Northwest Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friedt v. Alstad et al
as 4:2021cv00056
Defendant:
Reginald Michael, Pete Bludworth, Kari Alstad and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Friedt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Alstad et al
as 4:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Reginald Michael, Cynthia Wolkin, Pete Bludworth and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burd v. Sgt. Weber et al
as 6:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shane Louis Burd
Defendant:
Carrie Walsted, Lt. Postma, Billie Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clary v. Michaels et al
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Sgt. Quinn, Paul Rees, D Unit Manager Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Clary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Burkbile et al
as 4:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Conell, Burkbile, Vines and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson et al v. Alstad et al
as 4:2021cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dennis Friedt, Richard Patterson and Mikeal Pruett
Defendant:
Reginald Michael, Kari Alstad, Pete Bludworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demarie v. Michaels et al
as 6:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
Darren C. Demarie
Defendant:
Reginald Michael, Peter Bludworth, James Salmonson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
