Cases 1 - 5 of 5
CLARK v. THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv10458
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CLARK
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Pension Fund of Cement Masons' Union Local Union No. 502 et al v. R & W Clark Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01024
Plaintiff:
Cement Masons' Local 502 and Plasterers Area 5 Annuity Fund, Cement Masons' Local No. 502 Retiree Welfare Fund, Cement Masons' Union Local 502 Apprentice Educational and Training Trust and others
Defendant:
Richard Clark and R & W Clark Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Sean Richard Clarke
as 2:2019cv05785
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 12 Defined Contribution Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Vacation-Holiday Savings Trust and others
Defendant:
Sean Richard Clarke and Sean Richard Clarke an individual doing business as SR Clarke Landscape Architecture and Development
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Clark
as 1:2014cv06791
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund and others
Defendant:
Richard Clark and R & W Clark Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Structural Iron Workers Local Union No. 1 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Clark
as 1:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
Structural Iron Workers Local Union No. 1 Pension Trust Fund, Structural Iron Workers Local Union No. 1 Pension Trust Fund, Structural Iron Workers Local Union No. 1 Pension Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Richard Clark
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
