Cases 1 - 10 of 20
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, GEORGE PIRRONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COULSTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04077
Plaintiff:
TROY COULSTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KAREN ANSEL, CHARLES BENTHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05268
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAVID E DESIDERIO, ASS'T. D.A. DAVID WEBB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRIS v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 2:2021cv03006
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0151
WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv02057
Defendant:
MICHAEL BURKE, MANUEL SANTIAGO, THE ESTATE OF CHARLES PERMINT and others
Plaintiff:
THEOPHALIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
HARRIS et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00407
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HARRIS and RICHARD HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. v. PALM 1 LLC et al
as 2:2016cv03015
Plaintiff:
AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
PALM 1 LLC and RICHARD HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
HARRIS v. BRONCS, INC
as 2:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS, JR.
Defendant:
BRONCS, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris v. Risbon et al
as 3:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Richard Harris
Defendant:
David Risbon , Jerry Everhart , Mary Ann Morder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. COREY et al
as 2:2014cv03136
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
CHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT , THE CITY OF CHESTER and WILLIAM CAREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
