Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Jones v. Bonnyman et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Claudia C. Bonnyman, Richard Montgomery, Ellen L. Hobbs Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Premier Recovery Group, Inc.
as 2:2018cv01304
Defendant:
Premier Recovery Group, Inc., Joey M Younger, Plaza Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Haynes v. Board of Paroles Members/Chairman et al
as 3:2018cv00441
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Haynes
Defendant:
Board of Paroles Members/Chairman, Stacee Patterson, Director of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGrone v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00395
Plaintiff:
Frankln Delano McGrone
Defendant:
Robert Carter, Bobby Peacock, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valentine v. Ford et al
as 1:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Gregory Valentine
Defendant:
Helen Ford, Jim Purviance, David Liner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Johnson v. Jane & John Doe, et al
as 16-6710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE & JOHN DOE, LISA OWNBY, Parole Officer, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Johnson v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv02740
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
Jane and John Doe, Lisa Ownby, Any and all Supervisors in the Board of parole and T.D.O.C. in Collusion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Huntington National Bank
as 4:2015cv01953
Plaintiff:
Richard Montgomery
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency and Huntington National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clifton v. Schofield, et al
as 1:2015cv01189
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Clifton
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield , Charles Traughber, Richard Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turner v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2014cv01810
Plaintiff:
Clyde Turner
Defendant:
Richard Montgomery and Amanda Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
