Cases 31 - 40 of 54
United States of America v. Approximately $64,470
as 6:2017cv02042
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $64,470 and Richard Thomas Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Thomas v. Barrow County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv00256
Petitioner:
Michael Richard Thomas
Respondent:
Barrow County Sheriff's Office, Jud Smith and Robert A. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Thomas v. Barrow County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 17-13839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RICHARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARROW COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER JEFFERY SCOTT, Badge #817 and others
Michael Thomas v. Barrow County Jail, et al
as 17-13838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RICHARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARROW COUNTY JAIL, PHILLIP NOWLIN, Medical Doctor and KEVIN WILLIAMS, Dentist
Thomas v. Barrow County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv00231
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Thomas
Defendant:
Barrow County Jail, Phillip Nowlin, Kevin Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Richard Magnotti
as 16-15124
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD THOMAS MAGNOTTI
Thomas v. Barrow County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Thomas
Defendant:
Barrow County Sheriff's Office, Auburn Police Department, Jeffery Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Thomas v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 14-11991
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK RICHARD THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Roland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2014cv00525
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Roland, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fierro et al v. Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2013cv00718
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fierro , Eugene Kuehnis , Daniel Muraira and others
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
