Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Richard Cooey, II v. Ted Strickland, et al
as 10-3598
Intervenor - Appellant:
MICHAEL BEUKE
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND, Governor, State of Ohio, ERNIE L. MOORE, Warden, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Faciltiy
Richard Cooey, II, et al v. Ted Strickland
as 10-3467
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II, et al.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL M DURR
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND, et al.
Richard Cooey, II, et al v. Ted Strickland, et al
as 09-4474
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II, et al.,
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH BIROS
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND, et al.,
Richard Cooey, II, et al v. Ted Strickland, et al
as 09-4300
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II, et al.,
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH BIROS
Defendant - Appellant:
TED STRICKLAND, et al.,
Richard Cooey, II, et al v. Ted Strickland, et al
as 09-3604
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH BIROS
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND, et al.,
Richard Cooey, II v. Ted Strickland
as 08-4387
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II
Intervenor - Appellant:
JOHNNIE BASTON
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND
Richard Cooey, II v. Ted Strickland, et al
as 08-4252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND
Richard Cooey, II v. Ted Strickland, et al
as 08-4198
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II
Intervenor - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. BENGE
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND, et al.,
Richard Cooey, II v. Ted Strickland, et al
as 08-4203
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II
Intervenor - Appellant:
ARTHUR TYLER
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND, et al.,
Richard Cooey, II v. Ted Strickland, et al
as 08-4205
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE COOEY, II
Intervenor - Appellant:
CLARENCE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
TED STRICKLAND, et al.,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
