Cases 11 - 20 of 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
Paul Thomas v. Kathleen Harder, et al
as 23-35456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL THOMAS, MD
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLEEN HARDER, MD, SAURABH GUPTA, MD, ERIN CRAMER, PA-C and others
Michael Campbell v. Rick Hill
as 23-55586
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK HILL, Warden
Rick Landers, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 23-55552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICK LANDERS, Co-Administrators for the Estate of Mikyley Rae Reitz and SALINAS ZARLING, Co-Administrators for the Estate of Mikyley Rae Reitz
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
Terrance Johnson, et al v. Carpenters of Western Washington Board of Trustees, et al
as 23-35370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE JOHNSON, BRENT YAHRAUS and JACY PURKISS, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of Carpenters of Western Washington Individual Account Pension Plan and the Carpenters Retirement Plan of Western Washington
Defendant / Appellee:
CARPENTERS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON BOARD OF TRUSTEES, NOE CASTILLO, RYAN HYKE and others
United States of America v. Myers
as 23-1034
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD BRUCE MYERS, Rick LNU and Rick Curtis
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
