Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Milk v. Ripperda et al
as 4:2023cv04063
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Milk
Defendant:
Travis Ripperda, Unknown Persons and/or Entities System Risk Management Team, Riley DeGroot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talbott et al v. Levine
as 4:2021cv04136
Plaintiff:
Robert Talbott and Janice Talbott
Defendant:
Jordan Levine
Counter Defendant:
Riley Talbott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Lytle et al
as 5:2021cv05011
Defendant:
Robert Larry Lytle, Belinda Lytle, R Larry Lytle Family Living Trust and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Riley v. City of Watertown
as 1:2020cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Riley
Defendant:
City of Watertown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Crow Creek Tribe of South Dakota v. Federal Communications Commission et al
as 1:2018cv01010
Plaintiff:
Crow Creek Tribe of South Dakota
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission, Ajit Pai, Michael O'Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Thompson v. Young et al
as 4:2018cv04026
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Thompson
Defendant:
Darren Young, Troy Ponto, Stanwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flying Horse v. Hansen et al
as 4:2016cv04119
Plaintiff:
Flying Horse and Joseph R. Flying Horse
Defendant:
Hansen, James Hansen, Doug Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brakeall v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2016cv04057
Plaintiff:
Winston Grey Brakeall
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Titus v. Riley et al
as 5:2015cv05075
Plaintiff:
Angel Titus
Defendant:
Edward Riley and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Riley v. Weber et al
as 5:2015cv05073
Plaintiff:
James Duane Riley
Defendant:
Douglas Weber, Mike Durfee State Prison and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
