Cases 1 - 5 of 5
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Trustee For The RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT v. Beidas et al
as 4:2022cv01891
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Trustee For The RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT and U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Defendant:
Bassam Beidas and Hanadi Beidas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McMahan v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 4:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
John M. McMahan
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, not in its Individual Capacity but solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT, Rushmore Loan Management Services, AVT Title Services LLC and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Beth Anne McMahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Frazier v. U.S. Bank, N.A.,
as 4:2020cv02960
Plaintiff:
James Frazier
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A., Not in Its Individual Capacity but solely as Trustee for The RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT and U.S. Bank, N.A.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
U.S Bank National Association, not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT v. Cortez et al
as 4:2020cv00856
Defendant:
Jonathan Cortez, Jose Garcia, Jasson Pec and others
Plaintiff:
U.S Bank National Association, not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank National Association, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Trustee For The RMAC Trust, Series 2016-Ctt, v. Epperson et al
as 5:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Michael Lindsey Pynes, Sandra Sinclair Epperson and Robert Daniel Pynes
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Trustee For The RMAC Trust, Series 2016-Ctt,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
