Cases 1 - 10 of 426
Bahrambeygui v. Robertson, et al.
as 24-2944
Petitioner:
ALI HASSEM BAHRAMBEYGUI
Respondent:
JAMES ROBERTSON and ROB BONTA
Kory, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2946
Plaintiff:
PIERRE KORY, M.D., LE TRINH HOANG, D.O., BRIAN TYSON, M.D. and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, REJI VARGHESE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and ERIKA CALDERON, in her official capacity as Executive Officer of the Osteopathic Medical Board of California
Cody Jay Brownstein v. Orange County Sheriffs Department et al
as 8:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Cody Jay Brownstein
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriffs Department and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-2790
Petitioner:
RONALD J. SMITH
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Ward v. Bonta et al
as 3:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ward
Defendant:
Attorney General Rob Bonta, Donna Ward and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Sanchez v. Bonta
as 3:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Gary R Sanchez
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Ctrl Alt Destroy, Inc. v. Elliot et al
as 3:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Ctrl Alt Destroy, Inc.
Defendant:
Nicole Elliot, Rob Bonta and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0151 Labor: National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
Thinn v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-2673
Petitioner:
CLINTON THINN
Respondent:
RAYBON JOHNSON, Warden and ROB BONTA
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Kevin Tate v. Rob Bonta et al
as 5:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tate
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
