Cases 1 - 10 of 54
MARTINEZ v. PARRY et al
as 1:2012cv06564
Plaintiff:
HECTOR MARTINEZ
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLNESS v. PARRY et al
as 1:2012cv06567
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOLNESS
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, ROBERT BAYARD, ANTONIO FIGUEROA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTIAGO v. PARRY et al
as 1:2012cv03791
Plaintiff:
PEDRO ENRIQUE SANTIAGO
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BALLARD v. PARRY et al
as 1:2012cv03172
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL BALLARD
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ v. BAYARD et al
as 1:2012cv02194
Plaintiff:
ERIK J. CRUZ
Defendant:
ROBERT BAYARD, JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOES II-IV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LOVE v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2012cv01455
Plaintiff:
JASON A. LOVE
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN PARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITLEY v. PARRY et al
as 1:2012cv00397
Plaintiff:
HAROLD WHITLEY
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, DAN MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PEREZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv06702
Plaintiff:
ANGELICA D. PEREZ
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, KEVIN PARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv06134
Plaintiff:
LAVAR JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, KEVIN PARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv06133
Plaintiff:
JONATHON LEE MARTINEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
