Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cleary v. Gibson et al
as 1:2022cv04427
Plaintiff:
John Cleary
Defendant:
Det. Adam Gibson, Police Chief Robert Copley, Unknown Quincy Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwayne Harris v. Dane Sigworth, et al
as 21-3316
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] HELM, Manager of Aramark Food, in their individual and official capacities, [UNKNOWN] ALBAIN, Assistant Director of Aramark Food, in their individual and official capacities, DANE SIGWORTH, Director of Aramark Food, in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE HARRIS
Curtis Lovelace, et al v. Adam Gibson, et al
as 20-3254
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF QUINCY, ADAM GIBSON, Detective, JOHN SUMMERS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINCOLN LOVELACE, LOGAN LOVELACE, CHRISTINE LOVELACE, on behalf of her minor son, Larson Lovelace and others
Adam Gibson, et al v. Sue Myerscough
as 19-2342
Interested Party:
CURTIS LOVELACE, LINCOLN LOVELACE, CHRISTINE LOVELACE, on behalf of her minor son, Larson Lovelace and others
Petitioner:
ADAM GIBSON, Detective, ROBERT COPLEY, Police Chief, JAMES KELLER, Coroner and others
Respondent:
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH
Newman v. The City of Quincy et al
as 3:2017cv03147
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Newman
Defendant:
The City of Quincy, Robert Copley, Kyle Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelace et al v. Gibson et al
as 1:2017cv01201
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lovelace , Logan Lovelace , Lincoln Lovelace and others
Defendant:
Adam Gibson, Robert Copley, John Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBB et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05095
Plaintiff:
DONNA F. COBB , GARY COOPER , JAMES FRANK and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
