Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Robert McKinnon, III v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13390
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT MCKINNON, III
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
McKinnon v. Flores (Holmes)
as 3:2023cv01196
Petitioner:
Robert McKinnon, III
Respondent:
Robert Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Flores (Holmes)
as 5:2023cv00629
Petitioner:
Robert McKinnon, III
Respondent:
Robert Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Marion)
as 3:2023cv01048
Petitioner:
Robert McKinnon, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon, v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Robert McKinnon, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Bryan County, Georgia Sheriff Deputy #1 et al
as 4:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Robert McKinnon, III
Defendant:
Bryan County, Georgia Sheriff Deputy #1, Bryan County, Georgia Sheriff Sergeant Hatfield (Deputy #2), Bryan County, Georgia Superior Court Magistrate Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNON III v. DEPUTY 1 et al
as 5:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCKINNON III
Defendant:
DEPUTY 1, HATFIELD and SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert McKinnon, III v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 20-11223
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT MCKINNON, III
MCKINNON v. INCH
as 1:2020cv00015
Respondent:
MARK S INCH
Petitioner:
ROBERT MCKINNON, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
