Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Rose et al v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC
as 2:2023cv01979
Plaintiff:
Robert Rose and Paul Simi
Defendant:
Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Rose et al v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC
as 2:2023at00930
Plaintiff:
Robert Rose and Paul Simi
Defendant:
Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Daniel Altstatt, et al v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 18-16422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. ALTSTATT and KIM EILEEN GLAZZARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Sacramento County and others
(PS) Altstatt et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2018cv00150
Defendant:
Superior Court of the State of California, Sacramento County, Robert C. Hight, Julia Mason and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Altstatt and Kim Eileen Glazzard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores et al v. Salven et al
as 1:2013mc00057
Appellant:
Joe Flores and Connie Flores
Appellee:
James E. Salven , DDJ, Inc. , Robert Rose and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: DDJ, LLC
as 13-60065
Debtor:
In re: DDJ, LLC
Appellant:
JOE FLORES
Appellee:
JAMES E. SALVEN, Trustee, WILLIAM DAVIDSON, MICHAEL HEDBERG and others
In re: DDJ, Inc.
as 13-60059
Debtor:
In re: DDJ, INC.
Appellant:
JOE FLORES
Appellee:
JAMES E. SALVEN, Trustee, WILLIAM DAVIDSON, MICHAEL HEDBERG and others
In re: DDJ, LLC
as 13-60060
Debtor:
In re: DDJ, LLC
Appellant:
JOE FLORES
Appellee:
JAMES E. SALVEN, Trustee, WILLIAM DAVIDSON, MICHAEL HEDBERG and others
In re: DDJ, Inc.
as 13-60063
Debtor:
In re: DDJ, INC.
Appellant:
JOE FLORES
Appellee:
JAMES E. SALVEN, Trustee, WILLIAM DAVIDSON, MICHAEL HEDBERG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
