Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DURU v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00649
Defendant:
ANGELA D. CAESAR, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, CLERK'S OFFICE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURU v. HCA - CORPORATE HEADQUARTER, NASHVILLE - TN et al
as 1:2019mc00094
Defendant:
ROBERT SCHREINER, KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, PORTER ADVENTIST HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
DURU v. KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA et al
as 1:2019cv00003
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, ROBERT SCHREINER, BANK OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DURU v. KAISER PERMANENTE et al
as 1:2018cv02752
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, ROBERT SCHREINER, HEIDI H. HARRISON and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DURU v. HCA-CORPORATE HEADQUARTER, NASHVILLE-TN et al
as 1:2018cv02762
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, ROBERT SCHREINER, PORTER ADVENTIST HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DURU v. KAISER PERMANENTE et al
as 1:2018cv02651
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, ROBERT SCHREINER, CRAIG FAERBER and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
DURU v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01547
Defendant:
ERIC BRENNEN, SOUTHEAST PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, MARK S. ZEMELMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DURU v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv01005
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KAREN MITCHELL, U.S. DISTRICT COURT CLERK FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DURU v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2017cv00504
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Defendant:
KAREN MITCHELL, DOJ/OIG/HHS - NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ATLANTA GEORGIA, MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
