Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Williams v. USA-2255
as 8:2024cv02750
Respondent:
USA-2255
Petitioner:
John Robert Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv02020
Plaintiff:
John Robert Williams, III
Defendant:
Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01835
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01781
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Warren v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2024cv01594
Defendant:
JCI Warden, JCI Officials, JCI Ast. Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Robert William Warren, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03545
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams III v. Prince George's County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2023cv03257
Plaintiff:
John Robert Williams III
Defendant:
Prince George's County Circuit Court and Elisha Braveboy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Temesgen et al
as 1:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
Bernard Kevin Campbell
Defendant:
Dr. Kasahun Temesgen, Dr. Robert Williams and YesCare Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Centerton, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davis
Defendant:
Centerton, Inc., Christopher Okala, Dr. Z and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wimberly
as 8:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Travis Wimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
