Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06038
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05975
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04535
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Meneses v. Bombomania, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv24875
Plaintiff:
Raul Meneses
Defendant:
Bombomania, Inc. and Roberto Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez-Vasquez v. Blanche
as 26-2695
Petitioner:
JOSE ROBERTO RAMIREZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mena v. Tu Tipico Dominicano Corp. et al
as 1:2026cv02510
Plaintiff:
Amaury Mena
Defendant:
Tu Tipico Dominicano Corp., Tu Tipico Restaurant Dominicano II Inc and Roberto Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 (a)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01947
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02134
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mena v. Tu Tipico Dominicano Corp. et al
as 1:2026cv02450
Plaintiff:
Amaury Mena
Defendant:
Tu Tipico Dominicano Corp., Tu Tipico Restaurant Dominicano II Inc and Roberto Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 (a) FLSA: Action for Overtime Wage Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
