Cases 31 - 40 of 1,333
Stone et al v. The Dallas County City Hall Officials et al
as 3:2023cv02597
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Leola Byrd Readmond and others
Defendant:
The Dallas County City Hall Officials, The Sheriff of Dallas County Texas, The Chief of Police of Dallas County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Warden, FMC
as 1:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
Raymond Robinson, III
Respondent:
Warden, FMC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robinson v. Adesoba et al
as 4:2023cv04413
Plaintiff:
Ronald Robinson
Defendant:
Samuel Adesoba, Kolton Stoker, Slyvia Hightower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robinson v. Brahma Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04290
Plaintiff:
Zane Robinson
Defendant:
Brahma Group, Inc., Terra Millennium Corporation, TMC Buyer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Murphy v. Robinson et al
as 3:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Ryan Albert Murphy
Defendant:
Jared Robinson, Mark Stevens, Dr. FNU Gallagow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WWCXLII v. Robinson
as 3:2023cv02475
Plaintiff:
WWCXLII LP
Defendant:
Aleshia Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00215
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
