Cases 61 - 70 of 121
Kostyshyn v. Cerino et al
as 1:2017cv01136
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
John A. Cerino, Sue L. Robinson and Richard G. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Schwartz v. Lumos Networks Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jacob Schwartz
Defendant:
Lumos Networks Corp., Robert E. Guth, Timothy G. Blitz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parshall v. Lumos Networks Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00369
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Lumos Networks Corp., Lawrence J. Askowitz, Timothy G. Biltz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Noble v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2017cv00353
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Noble
Defendant:
State Of Delaware, Jack Markell, Matt Denn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noble v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2017mc00062
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Noble
Defendant:
State Of Delaware, Jack Markell, Matt Denn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATS Aircraft, LLC v. Robinson Aircraft Interiors Inc.
as 1:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
PATS Aircraft, LLC
Defendant:
Robinson Aircraft Interiors Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Robinson Aircraft Interiors Inc.
Counter_defendant:
PATS Aircraft, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bird v. Cynosure, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bird
Defendant:
Cynosure, Inc. , Michael R. Davin , William O. Flannery and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kostyshyn v. Robinson et al
as 1:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Sue L. Robinson, John A. Cerino, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00052
Petitioner:
Brandon Robinson
Respondent:
Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
