Cases 61 - 70 of 550
Taylor v. Tornichio et al
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Pierre Rahsaan Taylor
Defendant:
Adolfo Tornichio, Stephen Wolaver, Alan Kraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv00778
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Robinson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McGowan v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGowan
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Mr. Cadogen, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M. Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Parham v. Robinson
as 2:2021cv05725
Petitioner:
Clemon D Parham
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carte et al v. American Electric Power Service Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv05651
Plaintiff:
Troy A. Carte, James M. Jones, William C. Robinson and others
Defendant:
American Electric Power Service Corporation and American Electric Power System Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Robinson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05609
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Robinson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. May et al
as 3:2021cv02247
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Hunter, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, DWO Mr. Watters, Major Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05461
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Robinson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
