Cases 1 - 10 of 815
AlBritton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Counselor Kayla Mallory, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Darrell N. Watson
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Captain Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Halmolton
as 7:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
David Robinson
Defendant:
Chad Halmolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Robinson et al
as 7:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Juwan Jackson
Defendant:
Robinson and Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rupprecht et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Rupprecht and Larris Hutton
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robinson v. Punturi
as 1:2024cv00550
Petitioner:
Adrian Robinson
Respondent:
Kevin Punturi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moultrie v. Robinson
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
A. David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Crosby
Defendant:
Larry Collins, David Robinson, Randall Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
