Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Robinson v. USA
as 3:2010cv00165
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Timothy Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. USA
as 3:2010cv00154
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson, Dudley v. Astrue, Michael
as 3:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Dudley Robinson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Recla, Roy S. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
Roy S. Recla
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mr. Martinez, Ms. Holinka and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Grant v. Robinson et al
as 3:2008cv00689
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
Daniel Robinson, Detective Benish, Tim Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. American Home Assurance Company et al
as 3:2008cv00619
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Robinson
Defendant:
American Home Assurance Company and V.T. Griffin Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BOUMAN, CHAD v. ROBINSON, S.
as 3:2007cv00367
Plaintiff:
CHAD BOUMAN
Defendant:
ROBINSON, S., ROBINSON, S., SPROUL, UNIT MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Henderson, Titus et al v. Raemisch, Rick et al
as 3:2008cv00390
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson, Garfield Cooley, Al-Amin Akbar and others
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch , Peter Huibregtse , Mark Heise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Teuscher et al
as 3:2008cv00257
Plaintiff:
Marcus C Robinson
Defendant:
Jeff Teuscher and Traci Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00171
Plaintiff:
Darren Rogers
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, MATTHEW FRANKS, RICHARD RAEMISCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
