Cases 1 - 6 of 6
PARKER v. ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC
as 1:2011cv00139
Plaintiff:
DANNY K. PARKER
Defendant:
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC
Added Per Amended Complaint Of 3/1/11:
SHEEHAN PIPE LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC v. INDIANA STATE NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
as 1:2008cv01651
Plaintiff:
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC and ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC v. THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv01161
Plaintiff:
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC and ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, INDIANA, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, INDIANA and FRANKLIN COUNTY AREA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC v. THE COUNTY OF DECATUR, INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv01149
Plaintiff:
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC and ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF DECATUR, INDIANA, DECATUR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and DECATUR COUNTY PLAN COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC v. 123.62 ACRES et al
as 1:2008cv00751
Plaintiff:
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC and others
Defendant:
123.62 ACRES, WILLIAM HARVEY HEGARTY, CONSTANCE BOYD HEGARTY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE, LLC v. MCCARROLL et al
as 1:2008cv00344
Plaintiff:
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE, LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE, LLC and ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE, LLC
Defendant:
DAVID LEE MCCARROLL, JACOBS FAMILY FARMS, LLC, DANNY K. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
