Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Raymond Whitall v. Stephanie Phan, et al
as 21-16463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND RICHARD WHITALL
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHANIE TRAN PHAN, M.D., Primary Care Physician, CDC and Rehabilitation, A. NEWTON, Supervising R.N. II, Salinas Valley State Prison, MS. DOWLESS, Public Health Nurse, Salinas Valley State Prison and others
Raymond Whitall v. S.D. Gutierrez, et al
as 19-17345
Defendant:
O. VALLES, Correctional Officer, R. QUINTERO, Correctional Counselor II/Correctional Captain, H. AYALA, Badge #69024, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND RICHARD WHITALL
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM MUNIZ, Warden, J. CABALLERO, Badge #83634, Correctional Officer, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
Raymond Whitall v. Stephanie Phan, et al
as 19-16397
Defendant:
A. NEWTON, N. WALKER, ROGER L. MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ELAINE CANTU, STEPHANIE TRAN PHAN, M.D., Primary Care Physician, CDCR, LAWRENCE GAMBOA, M.D., Chief Physician and Surgeon, Salinas Valley State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND RICHARD WHITALL
Whitall v. Gutierrez et al
as 3:2018cv01376
Plaintiff:
Raymond Richard Whitall
Defendant:
S.D. Gutierrez, J. Caballero, J. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitall v. Phan et al
as 5:2017cv05889
Plaintiff:
Raymond Richard Whitall
Defendant:
Stephanie Tran Phan, A. Newton, Ms. Dowless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Alves v. Dennis Vega, et al
as 17-15850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALVES
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS VEGA, BRIAN MCCLELLEN, RICKY FERNANDEZ and others
Neves v. Vega et al
as 3:2016cv02877
Plaintiff:
Jerry Neves
Defendant:
Dennis Vega, Brian McClellen, Ricky Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy v. Hubbard et al
as 3:2009cv03169
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Lacy
Defendant:
Susan Hubbard, Mike S. Evans, Roger L. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
