Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Mendoza v. Broomfield
as 23-3766
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL MENDOZA
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Jenkins v. Broomfield
as 23-3612
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL STEVEN JENKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of San Quentin State Prison
Mark Bradford v. Ron Broomfield
as 23-99005
Petitioner:
MARK ALAN BRADFORD
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden
Joseph Ochoa v. Ron Broomfield, et al
as 23-15836
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH OCHOA, Administrative Law Judge and JOSEPH OCHOA
Respondent / Appellee:
TAMMY L. CAMPBELL, Warden, California State Prison, Corcoran, California, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and RON BROOMFIELD, Warden, California State Prison, Corcoran, California
Jerome Carpenter v. Ron Broomfield, et al
as 23-15182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME CARPENTER
Defendant / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden and D. NELSON, Correctional Officer
Lupercio v. Broomfield
as 22-2088
Petitioner:
RAMON NAVARRO LUPERCIO
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, WARDEN
Noel Jackson v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-55937
Petitioner:
NOEL JACKSON
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Noel Jackson v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-99011
Petitioner:
NOEL JACKSON
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Hudson v. Broomfield
as 22-1551
Petitioner:
TORIANO GERMANE HUDSON
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, WARDEN
Donte Harris v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 22-15921
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONTE LEE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, RON DAVIS, Associate Director of Reception Center Transfers and others
Defendant:
J. ARNOLD, Captain, CDCR, M. BLOISE, Lieutenant, CDCR, B. HAUB, Lieutenant, CDCR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
