Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Ronald Brawner
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Director Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VASS v. BRAWNER
as 1:2024cv00723
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER A. VASS
Respondent:
RONALD BRAWNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aquilar v. Brawner
as 2:2022cv00019
Petitioner:
Leonard P. Aquilar and Leonard P. Aguilar
Respondent:
Ronald Brawner
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thanquarius Calhoun v. Ronald Brawner, et al
as 22-10313
Petitioner / Appellant:
THANQUARIUS R. CALHOUN
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD BRAWNER and TIMOTHY C. WARD
COOPER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD COOPER
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, DOCTOR SHARON LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00412
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, EDWARD FLOYD, EDWARD and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. BRAWNER
as 4:2021cv00201
Petitioner:
ANTONIO WALLACE
Respondent:
Ronald Brawner
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. BRAWNER
as 5:2021cv00197
Defendant:
WARDEN RONALD BRAWNER
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. BRAWNER
as 5:2021cv00193
Respondent:
RONALD BRAWNER
Petitioner:
ANTONIO WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
