Cases 1 - 6 of 6
E.T., et al v. Ronald George, et al
as 10-15248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
E.T., K.R., C.B. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, Chair of the Judicial Council of California, in his official capacity, WILLIAM C. VICKREY, Administrative Director of the Administrative Office of the Court of the Judicial Council, in his official capacity and JAMES M. MIZE, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, in his official capacity
Ross Shade, et al v. Ronald George, et al
as 09-16346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSS S. SHADE and ESTATE OF MARY C. SHADE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, WILLIAM C. VICKERY, in his capacity as Administrative Director of Courts, MARY M. ROBERTS and others
Janetta Sconiers, et al v. Mario Santos, et al
as 09-15601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANETTA SCONIERS and TIYEONDREA MCGLOTHIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIO SANTOS, is being sued in his individual and official capacity, PATRICIA SOTO, is being sued in her individual and official capacity, STEVEN R. HRDLICKA, is being sued in his individual and official capacity and others
Byron Scott v. D. Runnels, et al
as 09-15456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON LEROY SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
D. L. RUNNELS, CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT COURT and others
Francis Fahy v. The Supreme Court of Californi, et al
as 08-17496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS T. FAHY
Defendant - Appellee:
THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of California, CARLOS R. MORENO, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of California and others
Levi, et al v. George, et al
as 08-15242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIMON LEVI
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, JUDY JOHNSON, DEBRA LAWSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, Chief Justice, CARLOS R. MORENO, JOYCE L. LENNARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
