Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2019cv05623
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2018cv07048
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 mv
Fudge v. Rare Hospitality International, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05526
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Fudge
Defendant:
Rare Hospitality International, Inc. , CB Richard Ellis, Inc. , Crossroads Mall Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Snodgrass et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2017cv06273
Plaintiff:
Robyn Snodgrass , Ian Williams , Christopher Bivens and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
York College Legal And Compliance/EOC Officer/Sexual/Harassment Officer:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Officials And Business Agent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
York College Vice President And Responsible For Tyrone Forte:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thomas v. Bradt
as 9:2010cv00906
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas
Respondent:
Mark Bradt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Bradt
as 1:2010cv00525
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas
Respondent:
Mark Bradt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fudge v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv02665
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Fudge
Defendant:
City of New York, Maria Zapata and Jorge E. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
