Cases 1 - 10 of 387
Roundtree v. Sqeo et al
as 1:2024cv03421
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Sqeo, Stewart, Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose et al v. Lobo Luxur Bar Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
Andra Cheri Rose, Dessie Pilek, Jessica Hinton and others
Defendant:
Lobo Luxur Bar Inc. doing business as The Luxur and The Luxur Kitchen & Cocktails, Inc. doing business as Hacienda Calavera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Muhamed Abduba Dida and Mohamed Abduba Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre and Rosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Rosa v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Linda De La Rosa
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Robert Travis v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1264
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE TRAVIS
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, ELIZABETH A. LONGO, DAVID BOROWSKI, Judge and others
Rosa v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50045
Petitioner:
Eric Rosa
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rosa v. Lammer
as 1:2024cv01035
Petitioner:
Eric Rosa
Respondent:
Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hernandez v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03989
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rosas Hernandez
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
