Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Roundtree v. Sqeo et al
as 1:2024cv03421
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Sqeo, Stewart, Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree v. Acey et al
as 1:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
K. Acey, Officer Tisza, T. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. Jeelan Muhammad, et al
as 24-1496
Plaintiff:
LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant:
JEELAN MUHAMMAD, SUSAN SHEBEL, VELINDA LLORENS and others
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 23-3050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, OFFICER POWELL, OFFICER DIAZ and others
Roundtree v. Revlon, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv11565
Plaintiff:
Edith Roundtree
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. Defendant Lucil, et al
as 23-2576
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEFENDANT LUCIL, DEFENDANT COBBLE, DEFENDANT WALSH and others
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. Superintendent Rocco, et al
as 23-2561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCCO, MS. MITCHELL, JOHN DOE, Director(s) and others
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. Jeelan Muhammad, et al
as 23-2371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEELAN MUHAMMAD, SUSAN SHEBEL, VELINDA LLORENS and others
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. County of Cook, et al
as 23-2239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIEAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR. and LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF COOK, THOMAS J. DART, JOHN MUELLER and others
Roundtree v. Muhammad et al
as 1:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Jeelan Muhammad, Susan Shebel, Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
