Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PINSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2015cv01833
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Joyce K. Conley, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leigh v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
John S. Leigh
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TERRELL-BEY v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv01484
Petitioner:
BROOKS JAMES TERRELL-BEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BOARD OF PRISONS, Constance Reese, Rufus Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Reese et al
as 1:2011cv01644
Plaintiff:
Brooks James Terrell
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Rufus Williams, Victor Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Reese et al
as 1:2009cv02379
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Delbert Savers, A Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce v. Reese et al
as 1:2009cv02378
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Becky Clay, J. Savidge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGarvie v. Reese et al
as 1:2009cv02352
Plaintiff:
Maximilian McGarvie
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Rufus Williams, R E Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valenzuela v. Reese et al
as 1:2009cv02365
Plaintiff:
Allen Valenzuela
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Del Rey, Farris and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawalowa et al v. Reese et al
as 1:2009cv02321
Petitioner:
Clifton Hawalowa and Allen Valenzuela
Respondent:
Constance Reese, Del Rey, Farris and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
