Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ameris Bank v. Lumin Autoglass LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Lumin Autoglass LLC and Kirk Gibson Rummel, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Diana Rummel v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Diana Rummel
Defendant:
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Norman v. The White House et al
as 3:2022cv05154
Plaintiff:
Garred F. Norman
Defendant:
The White House, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(SS) Rummel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00202
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Amron Suzanne Rummel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rummel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021at00103
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Amron Suzanne Rummel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rummel v. Pan
as 2:2018cv02067
Plaintiff:
Marlene Burkitt and A. Suzanne Rummel
Defendant:
Richard Pan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rummel et al v. Pan
as 2:2018at01251
Plaintiff:
A. Suzanne Rummel and Marlene Burkitt
Defendant:
Richard Pan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rummel et al v. Pan
as 2:2018at01249
Plaintiff:
A. Suzanne Rummel and Marlene Burkitt
Defendant:
Richard Pan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rummel v. Burkitt
as 2:2018at01248
Plaintiff:
A. Suzanne Rummel
Defendant:
Marlene Burkitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rummel et al v. Pan
as 2:2018at01250
Plaintiff:
A. Suzanne Rummel and Marlene Burkitt
Defendant:
Richard Pan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
