Cases 1 - 10 of 33
GARRETT v. RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON et al
as 4:2026cv00808
Plaintiff:
WAYLON GARRETT
Defendant:
RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and MANUEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Ford v. Adrian West
as 25-12216
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LILROD FORD
Defendant:
ADRIAN WEST, Sergeant/CERT, Rutledge State Prison
James Edwards v. Warden, Rutledge State Prison
as 24-13632
Respondent:
RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Petitioner:
JAMES MARCEL EDWARDS
BOWMAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
ERICK DAWAYNE BOWMAN
Respondent:
JONES, WILLIE WILSON and RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
Erick Dawayne Bowman
Defendant:
Medical Nurse Dr. Jones, Willie Wilson and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wiza et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nathaniel Paige v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-12649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL PAIGE
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT TOOLE, SGT THOMAS, Rutledge State Prison and others
DAVIS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
QYMOAN DAVIS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF GEORGIA, Warden REAGAN BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELLAS v. GORDON et al
as 5:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LYNN BELLAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY GORDON, DEPUTY WARDEN FLEMMINGS and RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MCCLESTER et al
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
CUBA ALASKA MARTIN, III
Defendant:
COI CODY MCCLESTER, Deputy Warden DEXTER MOSES, Warden SCOTT WIZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
