Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Hoid
as 26-1111
Petitioner:
In re: EDWARD HOID
Respondent:
JASON MALTERUD, JEFF SATUR, JOSHUA BURKE and others
Hoid (PS) v. Malterud et al
as 1:2026cv01358
Plaintiff:
Edward Herbert Hoid
Defendant:
Jason Malterud, Jeff Satur, Joshua Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOID v. KNOP-2 NEWS et al
as 1:2025cv04176
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HOID
Defendant:
KNOP-2 NEWS, JASON MALTERUD, JOSHUA BURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoid v. KNOP-2 News et al
as 1:2025cv08851
Plaintiff:
Edward Hoid
Defendant:
KNOP-2 News, Jason Malterud, Joshua Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoid v. KNOP-2 News et al
as 2:2025cv00799
Plaintiff:
Edward H Hoid
Defendant:
KNOP-2 News, Jason Malterud, Joshua Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoid v. KNOP-2 News, et al
as 25-1314
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HOID
Defendant:
KNOP-2 NEWS, JASON MALTERUD, Longmont Police Department, JOSHUA BURKE, Longmont Police Department and others
Hoid et al (PS) v. KNOP-2 News et al
as 1:2025cv01164
Plaintiff:
Edward Hoid
Defendant:
KNOP-2 News, Jason Malterud, Joshua Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Intermountain Technology Group LLC et al v. Altigen Communications Inc.
as 2:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Intermountain Technology Group LLC and Ryan Day
Defendant:
Altigen Communications Inc.
Counter-Defendant:
Intermountain Technology Group LLC and Ryan Day
Counter-Claimant:
Altigen Communications Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
