Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Koonce et al v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Shantelle Ann Koonce and Devon Dontrell Koonce
Defendant:
Jason Allen Williams, Ryder Transportation Solutions, LLC and Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Discrimination
Patent Armory Inc. v. Ryder System, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Ryder System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
George Ramirez
Defendant:
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Boren v. Leon County, Texas et al
as 6:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Daundi Boren
Defendant:
Leon County, Texas and Byron Ryder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marr v. Croxton et al
as 5:2021cv00961
Plaintiff:
Amy Marr
Defendant:
Harold E Croxton, Available Movers & Storage, Inc. and Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kaspar v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00245
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sherman Bolivar Kaspar, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC v. Ryder System, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00679
Plaintiff:
Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Ryder System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
