Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd v. RadioShack Corp.
as 2:2014cv00769
Plaintiff:
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd
Defendant:
RadioShack Corp.
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv08369
Defendant:
Amazon.Com Inc, Best Buy Co Inc, Costco Wholesale Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd
Unknown:
Elizabeth L DeRieux
Target Corp. et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2011cv05515
Plaintiff:
Target Corp. , Sears Roebuck and Co. , Kmart Corp and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Pecial_master:
Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Target Corp. et al v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD et al
as 3:2011cv05514
Plaintiff:
Target Corp. , Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Kmart Corp and others
Defendant:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD, Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia), Tatung Company of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Target Corp. et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2011cv05515
Plaintiff:
Target Corp. , Sears Roebuck and Co. , Kmart Corp and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Target Corp. et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 4:2011cv05515
Plaintiff:
Target Corp. , Sears Roebuck and Co. , Kmart Corp and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Pecial_master:
Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv04945
Plaintiff:
Target Corp. , Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Kmart Corp and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
KYE Systems America Corp. v. RadioShack Corp. et al
as 2:2008cv05579
Plaintiff:
KYE Systems America Corp.
Defendant:
RadioShack Corp., Sakar Int'l, Inc., Targus Group Int'l, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
MDL No. 1917 In Re: Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007cv05944
Plaintiff:
ABC Appliance, Inc., Janet Ackerman, James E. Allee and others
Defendant:
Technicolor S.A, Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Beijing-Matsushita Color CRT Company, Ltd. and others
Respondent:
Alan Frankel
Interested Party:
Wettstein & Sons, Inc, Mitsubishi Digital Electronics Americas, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
State of Illinois, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division and State of Oregon
Other:
Douglas W. St. John, Donnie Clifton, Harry Garavanian and others
Not Yet Classified:
State of Connecticut, YRC, INC., Douglas A. Kelley and others
Special Master:
James Larson, Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, Honorable Charles A. Legge and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rich
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant:
Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor:
Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein and Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court:
Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Counter Defendant:
Rockwell Automation Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Acer America Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Counter Claimant:
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
State of South Carolina and State of California
Claimant:
Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee:
Charles W Daff
Petitioner:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
