Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gosain v. State Bank of India
as 19-2539
Defendant / Appellee:
Texplas India Private Ltd.
Defendant:
State Bank of India, New York Branch, as Successor to Bank of India Flushing Branch and State Bank of India (Mumbai)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rajiv Shah Gosain
Rachel Bernstein, et al v. John Kerry, et al
as 13-5312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rachel Bernstein, Stuart Elliot Hersh, Ron Moritz and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John F. Kerry, In his official capacity as Secreary of United States Department of State, Thomas R. Nides, In his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, John Doe, Director, Office of U.S. Foreign Assistance Resources, in his official capacity and others
BERNSTEIN et al v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2012cv01906
Plaintiff:
RACHEL BERNSTEIN , STUART HERSH , RON MORITZ and others
Defendant:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, THOMAS R. NIDES, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LAW OFFICES OF SNIDER AND ASSOCIATES, LLC. v. SHAH
as 1:2010cv02206
Plaintiff:
LAW OFFICES OF SNIDER AND ASSOCIATES, LLC.
Defendant:
RAJIV SHAH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
GOSAIN V STATE BANK OF INDIA
as 10-1225
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Rajiv Shah Gosain, Rajiv Shah Gosain, Rajiv Shah Gosain and others
US AID V BEARINGPOINT
as 10-1187
Appellee:
BearingPoint, Inc., BearingPoint, Inc., BearingPoint, Inc. and others
Appellant:
Rajiv Shah, Administrator, U.S. Agency for Intl. Development, Rajiv Shah, Administrator, U.S. Agency for Intl. Development, Rajiv Shah, Administrator, U.S. Agency for Intl. Development and others
KeyBank USA, National Association v. Midwest Mortgage Finance, LLC et al
as 1:2000cv00860
Plaintiff:
KeyBank USA, National Association
Defendant:
Midwest Mortgage Finance, LLC, Rajiv Shah, Sanjiv Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
