Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rakesh Dhingra v. Charles Esposito, et al
as 22-16774
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAKESH DHINGRA
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES ESPOSITO, "Chuck", ELIINA STEPHENSON, AKA Eliina N. Belenkiy, AKA Eliina Keitelman, FBI DIRECTOR, Washington, DC and others
Dhingra v. Esposito et al
as 3:2022cv02207
Defendant: Eliina Stephenson, Charles Esposito, Eliina N. Belenkiy and others
Plaintiff: Rakesh Dhingra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Rakesh Dhingra
as 21-16458
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RAKESH DHINGRA
Rakesh Dhingra v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16957
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF CONSULAR AFFAIRS, DEPT. OF STATE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Investigations
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAKESH DHINGRA
USA v. Rakesh Dhingra
as 19-16323
Defendant / Appellant: RAKESH DHINGRA
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dhingra v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00360
Defendant: US Department of Homeland Security Investigations, Bureau of Consular Affairs, US Department of State and others
Plaintiff: Rakesh Dhingra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dhingra v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv06627
Plaintiff: Rakesh Dhingra
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dhingra v. Esposito et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv03600
Plaintiff: Rakesh Dhingra
Defendant: Charles J Esposito and Eliina Belenkiy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rakesh Dhingra v. USA
as 16-17198
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAKESH DHINGRA
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dhingra v. Belenkiy
as 3:2016cv06827
Plaintiff: Rakesh Dhingra
Defendant: Eliina Belenkiy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?