Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Curtis Fuller v. William Borgerding, et al
as 19-1776
Defendant / Appellee:
R. HARBAUGH, Nurse, DONALD HAIDER, C.O.D., R. LEWIS, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS FULLER, aka Raleem X
Hassan v. Reynoso et al
as 1:2019cv05938
Defendant:
Warden Raleem Moses, Nurse Jane Doe, Commissioners and Supervisors John and Jane Liability and others
Plaintiff:
Eslam Hassan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Borgerding et al
as 2:2019cv11477
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fuller and Raleem X
Defendant:
Richard D. Russell, R. Harbaugh, Patricia Lamb and others
Haynes v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2019cv01925
Defendant:
Department of Correction Officers John/Jane Does #1-25, New York City Department of Correction Commissioner Cynthia Brann, New York City Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Washington et al
as 3:2018cv13884
Defendant:
B. Pierce, John W. Prelesnik, W. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fuller and Raleem X
Perkins v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv06397
Defendant:
City of New York, Joseph Ponte, New York City Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03874
Plaintiff:
Stanley Holmes
Defendant:
The City of New York, Joseph Ponte, Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. The New York City Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv03250
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmes
Defendant:
The New York City Dept of Corrections, Joseph Ponte, Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raleem-X v. William Borgerding, et al
as 16-2353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALEEM-X
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BORGERDING, Doctor, DONALD E. HAPDEE, O.D., PRISONER COUNSELOR S. KING and others
Raleem-X, et al v. PCS Daily Dial Phone Company
as 16-2218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALEEM-X
Plaintiff:
ALYCIA WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
PCS DAILY DIAL PHONE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
