Cases 1 - 10 of 63
(PC) Mack v. Director of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Director of Corrections, S. M. Rios, Xavier Bercerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Garces v. Newsom, et al
as 2:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
Luis Manuel Garces
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Ralph M. Diaz, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Allen v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-55712
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden, MARTINEZ, Food Manager and others
(PC) Jace v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Michael Jace
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Kathleen Allison, Tammy Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Arocha v. Diaz
as 2:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Rudy Arocha
Defendant:
Ralph M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguon v. Glynn et al
as 3:2021cv02113
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Mary Anne Glynn, Steven Roberts, John Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Springs v. Raber et al
as 3:2021cv00862
Defendant:
D. Polard, Esposita, Reyes and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Larson v. Covello
as 2:2021cv00235
Defendant:
Ralph M. Diaz, Clark Kelso and P. Covello
Plaintiff:
Daniel Douglas Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dustin v. Pfeiffer et al
as 4:2021cv00574
Defendant:
State of California, Warden O Pfeiffer and Ralph M. Diaz
Plaintiff:
D. Dustin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramscher v. Newsom et al
as 3:2020cv07027
Plaintiff:
William R. Bramscher
Defendant:
K. Hoffman, Ralph M. Diaz, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
