Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
KARUPAIYAN et al v. SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS et al
as 2:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN, SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN, P P. and others
Defendant:
SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, NAGA LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KARUPAIYAN et al v. SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS et al
as 2:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN, SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN, P. P. and others
Defendant:
SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, NAGA LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv13600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
RAMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv15449
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
DONNA RAMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC v. RAMAN et al
as 2:2016cv01029
Plaintiff:
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC
Defendant:
KANTI RAMAN and SAROJ PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. JAY PRABHU, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03897
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
JAY PRABHU, LLC, MUKUND PATEL, RAMAN PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. NRSP, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03703
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
NRSP, LLC, NAVNIT PATEL, RAMAN PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. v. AKASH, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05755
Plaintiff:
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
AKASH, INC., KANTI RAMAN and SAROJBEN PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
