Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Flores, Ramon v. Warden of FCI - Oxford
as 3:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Ramon Flores
Respondent:
Warden of FCI - Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvarado v. Hepp
as 2:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nykerk v. Jagdfeld et al
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Nykerk
Defendant:
Aaron Jagdfeld, York A. Ragen, Marcia J. Avedon and others
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
John Birdyshaw, Mathew Burns, Chad Geschke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarado v. Burns et al
as 2:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Matthew Burns and Ryan Kuepper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Beahm et al
as 2:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, John Birdyshaw, Officer Felski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Alderman et al
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Officer Alderman, Joseph Beahm, John Birdyshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterbcow et al v. Jagdfeld et al
as 2:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Barbara Sterbcow, Karen Bento and Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Aaron Jagdfeld, York A Ragen, Marcia J Avedon and others
Nominal Defendant:
Generac Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Alvarado v. Beahm et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Nikita Barbeau, Jodi Barrett, Sgt Joseph Beahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
John Birdyshaw, Felske Hawkins, Cpt Kyle Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
